Weblog
Tuesday, 09 February 2010
-
Six Promises of Christ to His People (Updated, 2010)
Possibly one of the most abused passages of the Old Testament is this present one in Daniel 9:24-27. It is also a demonstration - if such were needed - that eschatological error can serious effect our theology, can actually take away from our view of Christ's glory.
This passage does not have to do with Antichrist.
It does not have to do with some supposed sinister Covenant treacherously broken.
It has to do with what Christ did - and does - for the people of God, redeemed Christians and Jews. The other articles in this series (search for the tag "Daniel") have to do with the chart and the timing. Both of these go hand in hand. By the way, if you get bogged down in some of the parts, like the definitions of certain biblical terms using lists of Bible verse, by all means, you have my permission to just skip on down! Don't let my tediousness (!) be a hindrance to your enjoying the main points here. Very often the one who has closely studied a topic loses the ability to distinguish between what interests him and what interests the reader.
I hope this whole topic will be a blessing and encouragement for you as it certainly has for me!
At the very end there is a link to the next article on this topic.
SIX PROMISES OF CHRIST TO HIS PEOPLE
DANIEL 9:24There may well be more interpretations than there are weeks to this prophecy of Daniel 9:24- 27. While many different views have been around for a number of centuries the consensus of orthodox Christianity, until recent times at least, has almost always agreed that the fulfillment of these six promises were to be achieved through the Messiah, and that they were fulfilled during the century of Christ's life on earth.
This interpretation, long held by most of the early Church Fathers as well as the reformers, has now become a minority view in this last century and a half. I will leave it to others to address the errors of this modern view in the world. 1 - and there are a lot of them - this article will examine the text itself. Hopefully I will convince the thoughtful reader, open Bible before him or her, of the treasure that we have before us. When the text is put in it's right setting as one of the clearest and most encouraging promises concerning Christ, "the Author and Finisher of our faith", the lesser view will (this is my prayer) be shown for what it is: an unintentional dishonoring of Christ and a blurring of that wonderful truth of the one people of God. To know this passage and to meditate on it's truths can't help but strengthen our faith and magnify our Redeemer. God's people are constantly in need of the Living Waters and of the Balm of Gilead. But the modern Dispensational interpretation takes this away and trades it for superficially pleasing fictions that have little to do with Christ. This Balm of Gilead - at least some of it's particular comfort - is by them hermeneutically sealed up from the saints, Jews and Gentiles alike who know Jesus, for whom it is divinely intended 2. May God open our eyes to His wonderful provisions!
Here is the text that we need to study:
"Seventy weeks are determined upon your people and upon your holy city, to finish ["restrain"] the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy."
"Seventy weeks" = one unit = 490 years. This will have to be dealt with in a separate article. At any rate, if I can convince you what the six foretold events here are, and to Whom they refer, the timing will take care of itself.
"your people", "your holy city". The ones and the place Daniel prayed for, the Jews and Jerusalem. And yet "people" has a wider significance (Matt. 1:21, Rom. 9:26, 2nd Cor. 6:16, 1st Pet. 2:9- 10) as sure as Abraham is called "father of many people" and as sure as Japheth will dwell in the tents of Shem.
Christ is said to have done 6 things for His people (including us, since we are also part of the Israel of God and are sharers in their promises - Galatians 3:16; 6:16; 2nd Cor. 1:20):
1. Restrain transgression.
2. Make an end for sins.
3. Make reconciliation for iniquity.
4. Bring in everlasting righteousness.
5. Seal up the vision and prophecy.
6. Anoint the Most Holy (Christ is the "Most Holy").The last three events especially seem to relate to Christ as Prophet, Priest and King. But more on that later.
1. RESTRAIN TRANSGRESSION
Strong's Concordance says this:{3607} kala', kaw-law'; a primitive root; to restrict, by act (hold back or in) or word (prohibit): finish, forbid, keep (back), refrain, restrain, retain, shut up, be stayed, withhold.
But hold that thought. I seriously wonder where that "finish" comes from. A better source is Gesenius's "Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament". He makes no reference to the "finish" or "end" definition of KALA. Unfortunately, I have this book only in hard copy, so you will have to take my word for it : )
I did a search of the word on a Bible CD and came up with 17 occurrences from the Old Testament. As far as I know, these are the only uses of this word, KALA. A closer examination will reveal that none of them suggest the use of "finish" or "put an end to". The fact that that usage is insisted on in Daniel 9:24 - and nowhere else - makes me strongly suspect that Procrustean exegesis is going on, reading -into- the text to protect a system (eisegesis - the dreaded "Icy-Jesus"). In all other uses of the word (see below), it is translated by, "restrained", "refrained", "retained", "withhold", "forbid", "shut up", "stayed" (KJV for "held back"). The rendition at Dan. 9:24 is the sole oddball rendition. A study of the various cognates to this word (in Hebrew - and even in other languages) make the case even stronger. BTW, the "shut up" or "hemmed in" aspect shows up in words like "carcel" (jail) & "incarcerated" .
Here are the Old Testament uses of the word KALA:
Ge 8:2 The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained;
Ge 23:6 Hear us, my lord: thou art a mighty prince among us: in the choice of our sepulchres bury thy dead; none of us shall withhold from thee his sepulchre, but that thou mayest bury thy dead.
Ex 36:6 And Moses gave commandment, and they caused it to be proclaimed throughout the camp, saying, Let neither man nor woman make any more work for the offering of the sanctuary. So the people were restrained from bringing.
Nu 11:28 And Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of Moses, one of his young men, answered and said, My lord Moses, forbid them.
1Sa 6:10 And the men did so; and took two milch kine, and tied them to the cart, and shut up their calves at home:
1Sa 25:33 And blessed be thy advice, and blessed be thou, which hast kept me this day from coming to shed blood, and from avenging myself with mine own hand.
Ps 40:9 I have preached righteousness in the great congregation: lo, I have not refrained my lips, O LORD, thou knowest.
Ps 40:11 Withhold not thou thy tender mercies from me, O LORD: let thy lovingkindness and thy truth continually preserve me.
Ps 88:8 Thou hast put away mine acquaintance far from me; thou hast made me an abomination unto them: I am shut up, and I cannot come forth.
Ps 119:101 I have refrained my feet from every evil way, that I might keep thy word.
Ec 8:8 There is no man that hath power over the spirit to retain the spirit; neither hath he power in the day of death: and there is no discharge in that war; neither shall wickedness deliver those that are given to it.
Isa 43:6 I will say to the north, Give up; and to the south, Keep not back: bring my sons from far, and my daughters from the ends of the earth;
Jer 32:2 For then the king of Babylon's army besieged Jerusalem: and Jeremiah the prophet was shut up in the court of the prison, which was in the king of Judah's house.
Jer 32:3 For Zedekiah king of Judah had shut him up, saying, Wherefore dost thou prophesy, and say, Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will give this city into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall take it;
Eze 31:15 Thus saith the Lord GOD; In the day when he went down to the grave I caused a mourning: I covered the deep for him, and I restrained the floods thereof, and the great waters were stayed: and I caused Lebanon to mourn for him, and all the trees of the field fainted for him.
Da 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.
Hag 1:10 Therefore the heaven over you is stayed from dew, and the earth is stayed from her fruit.
2. MAKE AN END OF SINS
Many of us here remember the first Gulf War and the televised images of oil wells in the Gulf region burning almost out of control. The smoke from the burning could be seen clearly from space. I say "almost" out of control, because, though it took awhile, every one of those fires was extinguished."Gosh, thanks for the history lesson, Tom. What does this have to do with Daniel 9:24?"
The point is this: The method used to extinguish those fires illustrates the first and second of these prophesied events:
1. First the fires had to be capped. It would be ridiculous to put out fires while they were still being fed at the source, while fuel was still pouring out. So the firefighters stopped the fire, by means of a momentary explosion, arrested the pouring out of fuel (both liquid and oxygen). They then capped the well before it could re-ignite.
This is what Jesus did. First he took care of sin (singular) at its source. As far as we are concerned, He capped sin. This is the principle of sin, and Satan as the arch Fire-Starter. In Christ's perfect life, death on the Cross and resurrection we have the strong man overcome by the Stronger Man (Mark 3:27, Luke 11:21- 22), Satan bound (Rev. 20:1- 3). He triumphed openly over him by the Cross (Col. 2:13- 15). This is that "shutting up" (KALA) of transgression.
2. Then the individual fires (plural) could be put out. The Gulf War firefighters may not have used foam, but I will use it for this part of the illustration, since it fits the Hebrew word used here fairly well. CHATHAM (KJV "make an end of") really means "to cover up" - and because it is covered up, to hide from view. (Song of Sol. 4:12 is a good example). This is where God casts our sins behind His back because of Christ's death for us. This happened only at Calvary and will never be repeated.
I suspect that, like in the previous clause, a definition is read into the words, and not drawn out of the words. And, like in the previous clause, the assumption is that this clause ("make an end of sins") is referring to the end times, and not to the times of Christ, since clearly, sin has not been made an end of. No, that is true: Sin still exists to afflict, at times, the best of Christians. yet they are covered up. That is why the saint doesn't lose his salvation by an act of sin. For that matter, that is also why Old Testament saints like David did not lose theirs.
John Owen says this about this part of Daniel 9:24:
"And the most proper sense of the word [CHATHAM] is "to cover or conceal," and thence "seal," because thereby a thing is hidden...Now, to hide sin or transgression, in the Old Testament, is to pardon it, to forgive it. As, then, the former expression (KALA) respected the stop that was put to the power and progress of sin by the grace of the gospel, as Titus 2:11, 12, so does this the pardon and removal of the guilt of it by the mercy proclaimed and tendered in the gospel."
RESTRAINED, BUT NOT FINISHED
"Seventy weeks are determined for your people, and for your holy city, to shut up [restrain] the transgression,..."Like I wrote above, "KALA" is never rendered "to finish" or "put an end to", except (dubiously, I contend) here in Daniel 9:24. It should rather be translated "shut up", "restrained", etc. I also listed all of the occurrences of the word in the previous post, so I won't repeat them here.
RESTRAINING TRANSGRESSION IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
This prophesied event is seen in the New Testament. Whether what is being restrained in the following passages is sin or Satan, the one who had enslaved us by sin, these passages are all speaking of the same time, that time when Christ freed us on the Cross and restrained transgression. Sin is not totally destroyed, neither is Satan. Yet his power has been broken by the Cross.Each of the verses below illustrate, I believe, the foretold restraining of Dan. 9:24. The exact word in each verse that describes that event I have rendered in ALLCAPS:
"Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might RENDER POWERLESS him who had the power of death, that is, the devil," (Hebrews 2:14)
"And you know what RESTRAINS him now, so that in his time he will be revealed. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now RESTRAINS will do so until he is taken out of the way." (2nd Thess. 2:6- 7)
"Or how can anyone enter the strong man's house and carry off his property, unless he first BINDS the strong man? And then he will plunder his house." (Matt. 12:29)
"But if I cast out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you. When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed But when someone stronger than he attacks him and OVERPOWERS him, he takes away from him all his armor on which he had relied and distributes his plunder." (Luke 11:20- 22)
(This verse does not have the "restrain" aspect. However the cross-reference above it - clearly the same event - does.)
"Then I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding the key of the abyss and a GREAT CHAIN in his hand. And he laid hold of the dragon, the serpent of old, who is the devil and Satan, and BOUND HIM for a thousand years; and he threw him into the abyss, and SHUT IT and SEALED IT OVER HIM, so that he would not deceive the nations any longer, until the thousand years were completed; after these things he must be released for a short time." (Rev. 20:1- 3)
3. MAKE RECONCILIATION FOR INIQUITY
We now come to the third event of Christ's ministry for His people. We are told in this passage that He will come "to make reconciliation for iniquity". This reconciliation had occurred at the cross. This is when reconciliation was first effected, by the perfect life and sinless death of the God-man, Christ Jesus, the perfect sacrificial Lamb of God. Because there was (is) no blemish in His sacrifice, or fault in His life of demonstrated holiness, we too, who believe in Christ's sacrifice for us, are totally accepted in Christ (Eph. 1:6)."Reconciliation" means to "hide", "cover" or "pardon". This is what God does with our sins in view of Christ's payment for them. It is not as though, strictly speaking they cease to exist. (That day will come. Wonderful thought!) We are pardoned because of the peace attained for us by Christ (Eph. 2:14- 22; especially verses 13- 17). Christ is our peace. Matthew Henry writes: "He is not only the peace-maker, but the peace. He is the atonement."
He is our reconciliation, our ongoing means of acceptance with God. This prophesied reconciliation is not only found here in Dan. 9, but was promised as far back as Genesis 3:15, when our first parents were first encouraged with the good news of a coming Savior.
Where else do we read of this reconciliation that we have through Christ Jesus? Here are just some of the many verses that could be quoted:
Ro 5:11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.
2Co 5:18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
Col 1:20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.
Heb 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
Think of it! How greatly this doctrine magnifies Jesus Christ, our great High Priest! Approaching the altar as the Priest without blemish He presented the perfect sacrifice - Himself! Who among the godliest of the Old Testament Priests could have foreseen that they were, in their persons and vocation, types of such an astounding act of God? Christ is the High Priest who puts an end to all other priests - and to the Levitical priesthood altogether. Jesus Christ was at the same time "Priest of the most high God" (Heb. 7:1), "holy, innocent, undefiled, separate from sinners" (verse 26) and the "Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world" (John 1:29), both sacrificer and sacrifice.
The next phrase ("bring in everlasting righteousness") is a positive statement of what is here stated negatively. The two phrases go together. In fact, some see these next three events as being chiastic to the first three. A chiasm is an inverted structure that God's Word often uses, as in ABCCBA. I am not sure, however, if there is a chiasm here.
GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE FINAL THREE EVENTS
These last three prophesied events confirm the Messiah as Priest, Prophet and King:1. His Priesthood is shown by his bringing in everlasting righteousness. He did this by living a righteous - perfect - life, and by being the spotless Lamb, sacrificed for our sin. His death, as well as His life, pleads for us. As Wesley well put it:
"Five bleeding wounds He bears,
Sustained on Calvary.
They pour effectual prayers.
They strongly plead for me,".What has this to do with "everlasting righteousness"? Everything. It is at the Cross that Christ is able to be, as our Perfect Priest 2, "both just and justifier of him who has faith in Jesus" (Romans). In Christ we are declared righteous by imputation so that we can be increasingly righteous in experience. This is having "Christ formed in us".
2. His office as Prophet is shown by his sealing up of vision and prophecy. God spoke before to us in various ways, but from the time of the unveiling of the Gospel He has now spoken to us through the Son. Christ is the Prophet who puts an end to all prophets and prophecy (Heb. 1:1- 2).
3. His Kingship is shown by his anointing of the Most Holy. Some versions imply that the anointing is of the most holy PLACE, yet that word is not in the original. Textually, either "place" or "person" is a possible recipient of "anoint". Scripturally, I believe the case is much stronger for a person, namely, the Lord Jesus Christ .
Now let us look at these last three events in more individual detail:
4. BRING IN EVERLASTING RIGHTEOUSNESS
The next phrase ("bring in everlasting righteousness") is the first of three positive statements. The first three events prophesied in Daniel were largely negative, that is, a taking care of a negative situation - our sin. For God to do His work, He must first rectify the mess we have made. This reminds us of God's mission for the prophet Jeremiah (Jer. 1:10):"See, I have this day set you [speaking to the prophet] ...
To root out and to pull down,
To destroy and to throw down.
To build and to plant."Now we get into God's building up (edification, edifice) through Jesus Christ. This bringing in of "everlasting righteousness" is nothing less than the new life that we have in Christ Jesus. "Not having our own righteousness". This is the righteousness that the Holy Spirit convinces the saints ( and saints-to-be) of (John 16:10). Sadly, very many of the Jews had missed (and still miss) the glory of this righteousness, having held onto their own works-righteousness (Rom. 10:3- 4). There are many passages in the Old testament (especially in Isaiah) that promise this righteousness to come to God's people. Below is just one of many, Isaiah 56:1:
"Thus says the LORD, Keep judgment, and do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed."
Isaiah 45:17:
"But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: ye shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end."
The "everlasting salvation" here is this same everlasting righteousness. The "Israel" here is not national Israel, but the true "Israel of God" (Gal. 5:16, Rom. 2:28- 29; 11:26- 27), redeemed people of both Jews and Gentiles.
Romans 5 is a rich source of information of this righteousness that is the possession of all saints. Since we are reconciled by His death (vs. 10) we are likewise saved by His life. We now reign in life because of the gift of God's grace, applying Christ's righteousness to us (vs. 17ff). Not only this, but we also are enabled to actively work out Christ's righteousness in our lives (Romans 6:13-23, Phil. 2:12- 13, Rev. 19:8). All saints are perfectly righteous positionally, yet we are far from perfect experientially. To be sure, I believe we will always have faults up until the last day of our lives, yet every true saint will grow in grace. God does not have any still-born children.
There are very many other passages that beautifully elaborate this righteousness we have in Christ: 2nd Cor. 5:20- 21; John 6:40; Phil. 3:9, etc.
5. SEAL UP VISION AND PROPHECY
These last two events (sealing up and anointing) are perhaps the most controversial of all, not only as to the timing but as to the respective meanings. But if we keep in mind that these events, like the previous four, must have been fulfilled within the "seventy weeks" we will already have eliminated many wrong interpretations. We will know, for instance, that sealing up the vision and prophecy can Not mean, like at least some dispensationalists insist, that the everything prophesied has to come to fulfillment. Yet we know of some predicted events that are clearly in the future (like 1st Cor. 15:28, when all things will be subject to the Son and, then, the Son will be subject to the Father, "that God may be all in all").Understanding also that there should be no separation between the three components of the 70 weeks (7 + 42 + 1) directs us to find the fulfillment for this prophecy in the first century.
OK, so much for what the phrase does not mean. What does it mean? First of all it should be mentioned that the actual phrase is "to seal up the vision and prophet". Let us take a look at this "seal up" ("chatam"), and how Scripture uses the term. Here is a representative sampling of the twenty plus uses of the Hebrew term:
"So she wrote letters in Ahab’s name, and sealed them with his seal, and sent the letters unto the elders and to the nobles that were in his city, dwelling with Naboth." (1st Kings 21:8)
"And because of all this we make a sure covenant, and write it; and our princes, Levites, and priests, seal unto it." (Neh. 9:38)
"Write also for the Jews, as it pleases you, in the king’s name, and seal it with the king’s ring: for the writing which is written in the king’s name, and sealed with the king’s ring, may no man reverse." (Esther 8:8)
"Bind up the testimony, seal the law among my disciples." (Isaiah 8:16. See also 29:9- 16 below)
"Men shall buy fields for money, and subscribe evidences, and seal them, and take witnesses in the land of Benjamin, and in the places about Jerusalem, and in the cities of Judah, and in the cities of the mountains, and in the cities of the valley, and in the cities of the south: for I will cause their captivity to return, says the LORD." (Jer. 32:44)
"But you, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased." (Dan. 12:4. See also verse 9)
Even though Daniel uses this same term in the twelfth chapter it seems that the usage is not exactly parallel. The sealing of 12:4 is one that Daniel himself is able to do. And the sealing of 12:9 is already accomplished at the time of the writing of Daniel ("the words are - present tense - closed up and sealed till the time of the end.") Yet the "sealing up" (back to 9:24) of "vision and prophet" is clearly part of God's grand purpose for His people. As such, this sealing up is tied to the Messianic promise, in line with rest of this prophecy. It may, or may not, be significant that "seal" ("chatam") is similar in sound (and cognate to?) the "determine" ("chatach") of Dan. 9:24.
So what does "seal" mean here? It is one of Daniel 9's many covenant-related words (see Neh. 9:38) . It means also to shut up, to "seal up". Consequently, it has come to mean "to finish" (see Gesenius) It has to do with authority and ownership (1st Kings 21:8, Jer. 32:44). When God uses this word, however, we are speaking of His sovereignty and lordship over His own. I believe Paul had this in mind when her wrote 2nd Tim. 2:19 and Eph. 1:13. The NT word "seal" or "sealed" is related to "chatam" in its application. (This needs to be studied out more carefully). For the believer (whether true Israel or Christian of the NT or our time) the sealing is a sign of God's ownership of us, and of His protection of us (2nd Cor. 1:22, Eph. 4:30, Rev. 7:3: 9:4).
The sealing up of vision and prophet is both a blessing and a curse, depending on the recipient. Consider Isaiah 29:9- 16). I know this is a long passage, but it is very helpful in showing us what the "sealing up" means for those who do not "take care how they hear" the Word of God:
Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink.
For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered.
And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed "(chatam"), which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed ("chatam") :
And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.
Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:
Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid.
Woe unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from the LORD, and their works are in the dark, and they say, Who seeth us? and who knoweth us?
Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay: for shall the work say of him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, He had no understanding?
This is the sealing up. And an awesome, sobering truth it is too. We must all take care how we hear. There are many now, just as then, who thought they they were "standing on the promises" but who are merely "sitting in the premises". This sealing up turns out to be two-edged sword. Because all of the promises in the OT had to do with Christ, in some way or other, once Christ came All those who persistently reject - or put off - obedience to the Truth they know make themselves prone to the judicial hardness of that same Word that could save them. The same sun that melts the wax hardens the clay. "Take heed how you hear". The overwhelming majority of Jews, when their promised Messiah came, didn't recognize Him because he didn't conform to their carnal and blind idea of what the Messiah should be like. So, by the 1st century, the vision and prophecy was sealed up. It had done its work. The "Annas" and "Simeons" - the receptive few - were benefited by promises. But "the rest were blinded". I believe also that, since prophecy in the OT was to point the way to Christ, the "sealing up" of "vision" and "prophet" means also that, since Christ, the Last Great Prophet, had come, there was no need for other prophecy. God spoke "in many portions and in many ways" through prophets in the past. But He now speaks to us through the Son (See Hebrews 1:1- 2). It may very well be that the "prophet" of Daniel 9:24 is the very same "Prophet" of Deuteronomy 18:18 and Heb. 1:2, namely Jesus Christ. The "sealing up" ("finish") of Christ, would then be the completion of His work on the cross, when He cried, "It is finished!".
6. ANOINT THE MOST HOLY
This anointing spoken of in Daniel 9:24 is the anointing of the Christ in the New Testament. Though there are references to His followers anointing Him, the primary application is to the Father 5. The physical temple ceased to be a factor in prophecy when Christ died on the Cross:"Jesus, when He had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost. And behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom..." (Matt. 27:50)
God did here what we have all with items of lesser importance: When we are done with it, we tear it in half. But God's temple was replaced with a better one:
"...having therefore, brothers, boldness to enter into the Holiest by the blood of Jesus. By a new and living way which He has consecrated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh." ! (Heb. 10:19).
Our Temple is Jesus. To be more precise, we who are in Christ Jesus are part of His temple, the body of Christ.
WHY IS ALL THIS IMPORTANT?
Hopefully I have shown, having gone through all of the six prophesied actions of the Messiah in Daniel 9:24, that these were all fulfilled in the time of Christ's first coming. To understand that these all relate to Calvary is to gain greater insight into what Christ has done for us, His elect. It actually magnifies Christ and encourages faith in Him. It not only proves that we will be, but that we already ARE overcomers through Him and in Him. The more these truths sink in, the more you will see the alternate view (a supposed future fulfillment of some or all of these events) as a cheat and a great devaluing of Messiah's redemption on the Cross.The people that the writer of Hebrews speaks of are those same people of God that Daniel prays for in Dan. 9. The more we go over these verses in Daniel 9:24 ff., the more we will see how the New testament has the cross-references that enable us to make sense of them. We have no desire of, nor need for, "newspaper theology" when it comes to parsing out this passage. By nailing down the New Testament fulfillment, we make more sure the present application to us: We can rest that much more securely in our salvation in Christ.
::::::::::::::: Notes ::::::::::::::::::::1. Suggested line of study: Consult a modern dispensational work, like Ryrie's or LaHaye's Study Bibles, or one of Lindsey's books, and find out which of these six prophesied events -they- say await fulfillment (or at least Full-fulfillment). It is interesting to see how they are quite willing to see some of these as having been fulfilled at the time of Christ's first coming and yet others still awaiting future fulfillment. But wouldn't it make more sense to see all of these as having been fulfilled at the same era - the time of Christ's earthly generation? I have often wondered which came first (like the chicken and egg conundrum), the need for a severed (still to come) seventieth week or the inability of recognizing the spiritual unity of the one people of God? See the separate article entitled "What is the Root Error of Modern Dispensationalism?"
2. The Talmud, being more spiritually astute than many modern Christians - and definitely than most modern Jews - teaches that all the prophecies of the prophets related to the Messiah. The Talmud would agree here with Paul that "all the promises of God in Him are Yes, and in Him Amen" (1st Cor. 1:20).
3. The best source for studying out the priesthood of Christ is the book of Hebrews. Every chapter from the 2nd to the 10th has at least one reference to the priesthood of Christ, and what this means for the believer. That would be a study in itself. Here are some verses from Hebrews that speak of Christ the High Priest: 2:17; 3:1; 4:14-15; :5:1, 5, 10; 6:20; 7:1, 26; 8:1-3; 9:7, 11, 25; 10:21; 13:11.
4. This belief that the text refers to the Messiah, as opposed to His Temple, was shared, interestingly, by many Jews throughout history. Nachmanides wrote: "This holy of the holies is the Messiah, who is sanctified from among the sons of David." The irony is that modern dispensationalists are at odds with this understanding of Jewish scholars, even while at the same time underscoring their interpretation as being God's plan for the Jews.
5. Anointing of Christ in the New Testament is primarily from God, secondarily from humans (Luke 7:38, 46; John 11:2; 12:3, etc.). See also these verses:
Lu 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
Joh 1:41 He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. (= the Anointed One)
Ac 4:27 For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,
Ac 10:38 How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.
Heb 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
Related article article:
Seventy Weeks = 490Years = One Unit of Time
Sunday, 07 February 2010
-
Oswald Chambers: A Cautionary Look
Oswald Chambers
A Cautionary Look at a Popular Devotional Teacher"NEXT TO, OF COURSE, THE BIBLE..."
It may be that if you ask any Christian what his or her favorite author is, besides the Bible, the answer may very well be "Oswald Chambers". He has become quite popular across the spectrum of modern Christendom and beyond. To be sure, much of his writings contain useful practical wisdom. This cannot be denied. Yet there is also another side to his writings, and to his life, that needs to be known. No man is free of theological error, and it is the teacher whose reputation is the highest who has the most opportunity (intentional or otherwise) of spreading error among the undiscerning."My Utmost for His Highest" is the book that comes most to mind when we think of the man. This is a devotional with daily readings like "The Daily Bread". "Utmost" goes a bit deeper than that other devotional however. "Deeper" does not always mean "better" though. While there is much good teaching, there is also much that is questionable.
CENTRAL TENET OF THE FAITH:
Oswald Chamber's spiritual father, at first at least, is none other than Charles Haddon Spurgeon. This is surprising, considering the quite different path, theologically and personally, Chamber's life took. (More on his life can be found from the links below). He shares with Spurgeon a tendency to draw much from a single text. He lacks, however, Spurgeon's orthodox emphasis on the centrality of the Atonement and justification through faith. Spurgeon, as well as orthodox classical Christianity, placed great emphasis of our salvation being based on the character and faithfulness of God. Chambers, on the other hand, emphasizes -our- holding on to God, -our- seeking after God as being the central defining tenet of our faith. As he says..."[T]he bedrock of Christianity is personal, passionate devotion to the Lord Jesus."
No, the bedrock of Christianity is Christ, the Cornerstone. If we are only as secure in Christ as our personal devotion to Him is in any moment, then we are in trouble - all of us. We are not standing, in that case, on the Rock, but are teetering on one of those swaying rickety bridges that responds to and amplifies all of our unsteady steps.
PERFECT SAVIOR or PERFECT SAINTS?
By "utmost" (in the title of his main book) Chambers means attainable perfection. He actively worked to spread Wesley's emphasis on perfectionism, commenting in 1908:"John Wesley's teaching has had no hold in Scotland in the past, but it seems now as if it is going to be grasped with a tenacious hold unequalled in the country."
Wesley's teaching was, of course, that Christians could become sinlessly perfect, what Chambers calls "sanctification". I put the word in quotes because this is not the Biblical term, but one that he pours his own meaning into. For Oswald Chambers, sanctification means nothing less than sinlessness. He believes the Christians can be, and should be, sinless. The "new-birth" means "no more sinning":
"Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin" (1 John 3:9). Do I seek to stop sinning or have I stopped sinning? To be born of God means that I have the supernatural power of God to stop sinning.
"In the Bible it is never--should a Christian sin? The Bible puts it emphatically: a Christian must not sin. The effective work of the new-birth life in us is that we do not commit sin; not merely that we have the power not to sin, but that we have stopped sinning." (Aug. 15th)
"Have I made this decision about sin--that it must be killed right out of me? Haul yourself up, take a time alone with God, make the moral decision and say, "Lord, identify me with Thy death until I know that sin is dead in me". (April 10th)
"Either God or sin must die in my life. The New Testament brings us right down to this one issue. If sin rules in me, God's life in me will be killed; if God rules in me, sin in me will be killed. There is no possible ultimate but that." (June 23rd)
The Biblical position, of course, is that Christians do sin from time to time. Not to see this is to have a low view of sin and to have an unrealistic, discouraging, frustrating, not to say unscriptural, view of Christianity. "If we say we have no sin, then the truth is not in us." (Ist John 1:8). After this verse is the promise that we can get cleansing from our sins by confession to Him. As we grow in grace, we sin less and less, but we are not sinless.
The source of our strength in our walk is in our meditation on Christ's perfection, not our own. When we think of ourselves it should be of our own imperfections and of our falling far short of the divine standard. The resultant humility ("poor in spirit") that this brings draws us nearer to Christ and enables the Holy Spirit to continue His work of Christlikeness in us (2nd Cor. 12:9- 10). Not surprisingly, Chambers does not favor this sort of "defeatist" introspection, insisting instead on attaining perfection by Gnostic/mystical means.
NEW LIFE or NEW LEAF?
"God will not give us good habits, He will not give us character, He will not make us walk aright. We have to do all that ourselves; we have to work out the salvation God has worked in. If you hesitate when God tells you to do a thing, you endanger your standing in grace (Nov. 12th)."At first this sounds quite acceptable. We do indeed have to "strive with Him" in our Christian walk. But he goes too far when he insists, as far as character and our walk are concerned, that we "have to do all that ourselves". That just isn't true. Rather we walk in the works that God has prepared for us (Eph 2:8- 10). Neither does hesitation endanger "standing in grace". It is a flimsy grace - and a tenuous (dare I say "fictional") salvation that can be blown away by mere hesitation. Once again Chamber's Arminian misunderstanding of salvation clouds the picture.
The Biblical teaching is that if we are in Christ we are new creatures. All things are new (2nd Cor. 5:17). Yes, we have the responsibility to obey. But if we falter, hesitate, blow it here or there, we do not suddenly become "old creatures" again.
SECOND WORK OF GRACE?
It is through a misunderstanding or devaluation of Christ's "first" work in the life of believers that Chambers posits the need for a "second work" of grace. Here he shows his Keswick roots. (More on that can be found from the URL below).Am I set in my ways, concerning God? We are never free from this snare until we are brought into the experience of the baptism of the Holy Ghost and fire (Jan. 28th).
God does not give us overcoming life; He gives us life as we overcome. When the inspiration of God comes, and He says, "Arise from the dead," we have to get up; God does not lift us up (Feb. 16th).
Ah, but God does lift us up. Paul says several times that we are raised up in Christ. It may be that we do not know this as we ought. The lack, in that case is not one of experience, but of teaching.
WHERE IS "CHURCH", "PASTOR", "MINISTRY", ETC?
A person's doctrine does not consist only of what he teaches. What he neglects to teach is also important. A reading of Chamber's works will find little mention of the church, unless it is spoken of collectively or in a bad light. There is little mention of pastors and preaching, nor corporate worship. Doctrine is likewise downplayed. Search for the words on the first of the web sites below and see for yourself. Instead the emphasis is on "abandonment" (a deeper life term first found, as far as I can tell, in the writings of Mrs. Pearsall Smith), personal devotion, personal seeking after God. Who can fault seeking after God? No one. Yet - and this is the needed balance - we are personally enriched and gifted by the Spirit of Christ in order to build up the Church. Reading Ephesians 4 you will find two mentions of "building up". The first is from the Spiritually gifted in the corporate church. The second is of the church "building up itself". All of this gets scant mention in Chambers' writing. If we had only his writing, we might think that the Christian walk was to be a monastic walk in the park or time in the prayer closet. Yet we are saved to serve, to build each other up.DOWNPLAYING DOCTRINE
Chambers, in common with many of the so-called "deeper life" advocates, builds up an artificial tension between intellect and mere obedience, as if both are not needed.They are both as essential as two wings on a plane. We cannot be obedient to what we don't understand. God's people die for a lack of knowledge, as the prophet said. Neither do we learn facts in order to just bury them.In the devotional for Oct. 10, Quoting Matt. 11:25 ("I thank Thee, 0 Father . . . because Thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.")
Chambers writes:
"All God's revelations are sealed until they are opened to us by obedience. You will never get them open by philosophy or thinking. Immediately you obey, a flash of light comes. Let God's truth work in you by soaking in it, not by worrying into it. The only way you can get to know is to stop trying to find out and by being born again. Obey God in the thing He shows you, and instantly the next thing is opened up. One reads tomes on the work of the Holy Spirit, when one five minutes of drastic obedience would make things as clear as a sunbeam. "I suppose I shall understand these things some day!" You can understand them now. It is not study that does it, but obedience. The tiniest fragment of obedience, and heaven opens and the profoundest truths of God are yours straight away. God will never reveal more truth about Himself until you have obeyed what you know already. Beware of becoming "wise and prudent."
He misses the point that obedience has to be based on knowledge. "You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free". At no time should we downplay the further pursuit of knowledge, rather we are to grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." (2nd Peter 3:18). We are to dedicate ourselves to a study of God's Word, though not neglecting the inner life of meditation and prayer.By studying Christ's Word we become more Christlike (2nd Cor. 3:18), we "save ourselves" and others (2nd Tim. 3:15; 1st Tim. 4:16) and much more. So doctrine is very important.
A Christian who reads Oswald Chamber for profit will certainly find some things in his writings to benefit from. Like much of what we find in our bookstores and on the Web wisdom is needed. For anyone who feels that I am unfairly criticizing this teacher I would only ask that he be read with Berean discernment. As you read him, ask yourself, "Is he emphasizing the very things that the Bible emphasizes?" "Is he using Biblical terms in a Biblical manner?" "Does he give central place to the foundational Person and doctrines of the Faith?"These are always fair questions to ask of any teacher.
Helpful Web Sites, Pro & Con:
Oswald Chamber's website. "My Utmost for His Highest."
Chamber's Keswick & Wesleyan connection.
This WELS site (Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod) has good comments of the need for balance in Chamber's writings.
Miles Stanford's Critique of the man. I don't agree with some of Stanford's theology yet he seemed to do a fair assessment of Chambers. I am indebted to this site for many of my actual quotes of Chambers.
Saturday, 06 February 2010
-
CS Lewis, a Trojan Horse?
[font color=white]
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == .protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try {var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-12887963-1");pageTracker._trackPageview();} catch(err) {}[/font]CS Lewis, a Trojan Horse?
Someone had commented on my referring to C.S. Lewis's "Mere Christianity" as a "Trojan Horse" for Christianity, I responded to him (see below), and then decided so much typing may as well be put to broader use, so here it is. In the interest of his privacy I left his moniker and actual comments out. The subject is an important one that warrants consideration and - I hope - discussion.
Fair enough question. But since your comment has no relation to the post above (since you are replying to something I wrote elsewhere) I will first paste those comments that you responded to. In a response to a friend's who wondered why those who balked at seeing the Harry Potter film on Scriptural grounds saw nothing wrong with going to the Narnia film, since both deal with magic and the occult. I had written this earlier:"Well, put me down as one of the Christians that wouldn't go to either Potter or Narnia movies. It was not just because of the magic - which is already an issue (magic dereferenced from Christ, in my view, will always be godless. But that would be a different typing session altogether). For me the main issue is what I know of Lewis the man, the theologian. His synthetic worldview - once you know it - stifles (in me at least) appreciation for his talent in writing and storytelling. I actually believe that Lewis's theology (as revealed even - or perhaps especially - in his Mere Christianity) has become a Trojan Horse for 20th and 21st century Christendom."
On to your question, (name withheld). I plan to write a series on CS Lewis, but for now suffice it to say that anyone who reads Mere Christianity (Lewis's most famous book) will find quotes that are quite inclusive of all Christendom and religion altogether, as if there is no essential, or crucial difference between them. Also his explanation of salvation is deficient. Examples:"Christians have often disputed as to whether what leads the Christian home is good actions, or Faith in Christ. I have no right really to speak on such a difficult question, but it does seem to me like asking which blade in a pair of scissors is most necessary. A serious moral effort is the only thing that will bring you to the point where you throw up the sponge."
I know that it is true that some become Christians through the "serious moral effort" route. They try, become discouraged, then despair... then God opens their eyes. But this is not the way of all, or even most, I would say. Were Paul's moral efforts - up until the time God blinded him in order to see the Light - the persecuting and killing of God's saints?
The even bigger problem here is that Lewis's advice puts faith and works on the same par. Scissors do not have unequal blades. Airplanes do not have unequal wings (Lewis's metaphor elsewhere in this book for faith and works).
For now I will just include one more quote (emphasis mine), describing Buddhists, for example, as being on the path to God (much more of this is articulated in Lewis's "Abolition of Man"):"There are people who do not accept the full Christian doctrine about Christ but who are so strongly attracted by Him that they are His in a much deeper sense than they themselves understand. There are people in other religions who are being led by God's secret influence to concentrate on those parts of their religion which are in agreement with Christianity, and who thus belong to Christ without knowing it. For example, a Buddhist of good will may be led to concentrate more and more on the Buddhist teaching about mercy and to leave in the background (though he may still say he believed) the Buddhist teaching on certain other points. Many of the good Pagans long before Christ's birth may have been in this position."
(These quotes, respectively, are from pages 128 and 176- 177 of "Mere Christianity", Macmillan paperback ed.)
The inspired Paul tells us in Romans that "There is no one good, not one." Jesus tells us in Mark that there is "no one good, except God". But wait, adds Lewis, don't forget those "many good pagans" who already belong to Christ without knowing it (thus without having to go through all that irksome fuss of renouncing their beliefs).
Does anyone else see a problem here? -
Jerusalem: Daniel and Isaiah (8)
Christ: The Masterbuilder
Isaiah 58:12
The next main passage that speaks of God's building up of Zion, His building up of the church, is Isaiah 58:12:
"Those from among you
Shall build up the waste places;
You shall raise up the foundations of many generations;
And you shall be called the Repairer of the Breach,
The Restorer of Streets to Dwell in."
This is one of those rebuilding verses that should be taken, first of all, literally. Isaiah predicts to his contemporaries that some of their progeny will be instrumental in rebuilding Jerusalem's ruins - before they are even ruined! This is proactive comfort given to God's people, and a mark of true prophet of God.
But I believe there is more than literal rebuilding spoken of here.Like in some of the earlier passages, I am convinced we have a blending of literal into spiritual. Considering the wider context of 58: 1- 14 it seems that the real foundation of the rebuilt foundation is not better bricks but better hearts, regenerated hearts of its citizens. From these new hearts come humility of spirit, social justice (vs. 6), acts of mercy (vs. 7), and, instead of outward mechanical and superficial compliance to God's Law, an inner heartfelt delight in God, brought about by God's Spirit bringing "truth in the inward parts".
God combines two metaphors here for Zion; a well-watered garden (11) and a city (12). This ties in well with many other passages like Jer. 17:8; Psalms 1 and 92:12 and 13. Here is that last passage:
"The righteous shall flourish like a palm tree,
He shall grow like a cedar in Lebanon.
Those who are planted in the house of the LORD
Shall flourish in the courts of our God.
They shall still bear fruit in old age.
They shall be fresh and flourishing (lit. "fat and green")
To declare that the LORD is upright;
He is my Rock, and there is no unrighteousness in Him."
We find a hint here, in my opinion at least, of the growth of God's Zion outward to the Gentiles by the mention of "cedar in Lebanon". "Lebanon" is sometimes used as an emblem of the beginning of the Gentile realms. The cedar in Lebanon and the palm tree together witness that God is a righteous and holy.
More later.... -
2nd Peter 2:1: Who is Denying Whom?
2nd Peter 2:1: Who is Denying Whom?Here is the first verse under consideration, 2nd Peter 2:1:
"But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves."This passage is often used as proof that the effects of Christ's atonement must be wider than to just the elect, since the false teachers here written of, had Christ die for them. Then attention is drawn to the different verbs often used for "ransom", "redeem" etc. But what is often overlooked is the noun in the verse: The one who is doing the rescuing. And the Old Testament reference is too often missed.
Let's take a closer look at this phrase:
"even denying the Master ("DESPOTEN") who bought ("AGWRASANTA") them..."
This verse is not even speaking of Jesus Christ, rather it refers to God the Father.
The whole passage is referring back to Deuteronomy 32:1- 6. I was going to type the whole passage, but since time is now short I will just let those who want to to look it up. You will see that there are similar themes. More on that in a minute. First we have Peter's word "DESPOTES", a word which, though it often means "Lord", it refers to the Father, and not the Son. "Kurios" is the Son's word for "Lord". Check these verses out:
"The only Lord (DESPOTEN) God and our Lord (KURION) JESUS CHRIST" ~Jude 4, referring respectively to first and second persons of the Trinity. Also: Luke 2:29; Acts 4:24; 2nd Timothy 2:21, Rev. 6:10, etc.
DESPOTES refers more to Lord as Master, while KURIOS refers more to Lord as Prince in reference to His subjects.
This fits in well with Scriptural uses, such as Christ being Prince of Peace. At any rate, 2nd Peter is referring to the Father and not to the Son. Nor is it referring to Calvary at all. How do we know this? Like I said, it goes back to Deut. 32:1- 6, which refers to God's rescuing the Israelites from Egypt.We know that these here in 2nd Peter could not be bought on the Cross by Christ, because all of those that Christ so bought will be rescued, not one will end up in the damnation that these teachers obviously fall into. See: John 10:29; Romans 8:29- 39; Eph. 1:11- 14.
Other signs that Peter was thinking of Deuteronomy 32 when writing 2nd Peter 2:1 are the similar words used. Compare the "spotted children" (TEKNA MWMETA) of Deut. 32:5 (LXX - Peter's version) with 2nd Peter 2:13 and 3:14. Just a little study of both passages, especially if you have access to the LXX, should convince any unbiased reader that this is the true cross-reference of 2nd Peter 2:1.
Why go through all this trouble for such a little verse?
It is just to show that this verse does not show that Christ died for some that He did not save. This is about those who were rescued from Egypt, a physical and not a spiritual one (though it was a gracious token and prophetic sign for true salvation). These false teachers, though rescued from by their Master, the Father, effectively denied Him, by teaching the other Israelites to follow after Gods "whom their father did not know".
Christ never died for such false teachers. Their very lives are proof of their never having been regenerated, nor called (in the Romans 8:30 sense), nor died for.
Christ only died for the "children whom God has given [Him]". For those, and only for those, He took on the "nature of flesh and blood" and rescued from the devil. See and study carefully Hebrews 2:10- 18. Christ comes to rescue the "Children". He assumes flesh and blood because the children are made of flesh and blood. He became like us so that we may become, within our creature limits, like Him! Everyone He bought He will keep. And, yes, we may flounder at times but that true faith implanted will show itself in a heavenward affinity and allegiance. Denial of the Lord (Kurios) who bought us - and teaching of heresies concerning Him - is just not possible.
- browse entries:
- older »
asterisktom
-
- Name: Tom
- Gender: Male
- Member Since: 6/14/2004
-
Premium
Connect
Weblog Archives
About Me
-
In 2002 a major piece in the puzzle fell into place, and I began to really appreciate the sovereignty of God - instead of avoiding the whole idea. I rejoice in my Savior and in all the riches of His grace. Unmerited, unlooked-for, unexpected...Hallelujah!










